Spell Dmg 3 Spells Cost 1 More 4
One time instant effect caster-only spells cost 30 mana and 30 magic, group versions cost 90 mana and 90 magic. Booster spells cost 65 mana and 65 magic, non-combat spells cost 45 mana and 45 magic. Spells that effect the enemy go by their attack spell equivalents.but maintain the defensive spell ratio. MISC SPELLS: 1. Mar 06, 2018 The other alternative that presents itself is the 5e monk ki-for-spells rates, where the cost is spell level + 1. Which is very nice and simple, and makes a 9th-level spell equal to only five 1st-level spells. Plus, one-point steps between levels means that you could change the 'At Higher Levels' language in spell descriptions to stuff like.
Spell Dmg 3 Spells Cost 1 More 2
Think of it as anti-armor for spells.
It negates some of the other guy's spell resist. This generally will not have a large effect on its own, especially after they made spell resist go up 1:1 with armor, and that's before any Spell Resists CP bonuses kick in.
What they should have done was make it a true 'Weakness to Magicka' instead, like in the standalone games.
The caveat is that someone with a large spell resist will see the most 'reduction' from this, but it will have little effect, as they had a large number to start.
Someone with a low spell resist will still see the same percentage, but it will have even less effect as they don't have as much to lose in the first place.
If someone had zero spell resist (which is basically not possible, as I understand it - think old version armor only physical mitigation, zero spell mitigation), it would have no effect at all. Maxed CP's = 25% more penetration: 0 - 25 % is still zero...
(In the standalone's, it would make you more susceptible to magic damage, vice ESO which makes you less not-susceptible. The two are far from equal.)
Short version, while good with sharpened traits, as it's quick and essentially free, save the CP's for that start as the last one you bother with.
Another thing to consider, if someone's counter-sinking points into increased Spell Resist, it will effectively almost negate your penetration.
You're better off adding more raw damage, then crit damage, and hitting spell penetration as the last on the list.
It negates some of the other guy's spell resist. This generally will not have a large effect on its own, especially after they made spell resist go up 1:1 with armor, and that's before any Spell Resists CP bonuses kick in.
What they should have done was make it a true 'Weakness to Magicka' instead, like in the standalone games.
The caveat is that someone with a large spell resist will see the most 'reduction' from this, but it will have little effect, as they had a large number to start.
Someone with a low spell resist will still see the same percentage, but it will have even less effect as they don't have as much to lose in the first place.
If someone had zero spell resist (which is basically not possible, as I understand it - think old version armor only physical mitigation, zero spell mitigation), it would have no effect at all. Maxed CP's = 25% more penetration: 0 - 25 % is still zero...
(In the standalone's, it would make you more susceptible to magic damage, vice ESO which makes you less not-susceptible. The two are far from equal.)
Short version, while good with sharpened traits, as it's quick and essentially free, save the CP's for that start as the last one you bother with.
Another thing to consider, if someone's counter-sinking points into increased Spell Resist, it will effectively almost negate your penetration.
You're better off adding more raw damage, then crit damage, and hitting spell penetration as the last on the list.